The Yuan requests your support! Our content will now be available free of charge for all registered subscribers, consistent with our mission to make AI a human commons accessible to all. We are therefore requesting donations from our readers so we may continue bringing you insightful reportage of this awesome technology that is sweeping the world. Donate now
The Myth of Artificial Intelligence
By Shifeng Wang  |  Jul 21, 2021
The Myth of Artificial Intelligence
Image courtesy of and under license from Shutterstock.com
Our ancestors went in fear of disease and the unknown wind, rain and lightning because they did not know what state succeeded the death, which these forebears also feared. Therefore, our progenitors consigned their own lives and their understanding thereof to the existence of higher powers, hoping to ease their senseless fear by surrendering some of their cognition and power to establish a channel for dialog with unknown forces.

SHANGHAI - Our ancestors went in fear of disease and the unknown wind, rain, and lightning because they did not know what state succeeded death, which these forebears also feared. Therefore, our progenitors consigned their own lives and their understanding thereof to the existence of higher powers, hoping to ease their senseless fear by surrendering some of their cognition and power to establish a channel for dialog with unknown forces.

The wheels of history are rolling forward, and high-level interlocutors are pushing human civilization to try to catch up with the pace of the real world, but the role of these interlocutors is not settled and is ever-shifting.

Someone coined the metaphor: "Going from Shaman to wizard is like going from Pythagoras to Newton, from Faraday to Maxwell."

The existence of wizards who pose as high-level interlocutors is usually very mysterious. Their incantations and spells are generally simple and primitive but contain immeasurable power. Wizards never claim to be gods; they imitate wind, rain, thunder and lightning, mimicking demons, and ghosts, but never believe they wield the power to kill. They do not even think they have the power to control nature. All they can do is commune with nature, to assuage nature's anger, or to offer up sacrifices in exchange for survival and peace. In the mouths of wizards and high priests, the gods on Mount Olympus, or Pangu and Nyuwa from Eastern creation mythology, have become deities in charge of natural phenomena. Humans no longer try to talk to and communicate with nature, but to appease these gods instead. They hope thereby to establish a stable and adaptable subordinate relationship. The power relationship between control and being controlled had already become deeply embedded in the logic of myth by this time.

The miracles of shamans achieved a basic explanation of natural phenomena and fixed a belief discourse system able to be explained i

The content herein is subject to copyright by The Yuan. All rights reserved. The content of the services is owned or licensed to The Yuan. Such content from The Yuan may be shared and reprinted but must clearly identify The Yuan as its original source. Content from a third-party copyright holder identified in the copyright notice contained in such third party’s content appearing in The Yuan must likewise be clearly labeled as such.
Continue reading
Sign up now to read this story for free.
- or -
Continue with Linkedin Continue with Google
Comments
Share your thoughts.
The Yuan wants to hear your voice. We welcome your on-topic commentary, critique, and expertise. All comments are moderated for civility.
n
nigelmc
2023-11-30
God-like computer-generated actions are a major concern but they are only possible because of the fallibility of the humans that program those computers. The real question that few seem willing to pose, because it demonstrates that computers are not in any way intelligent and that undermines the fundamental basis of pro-Artificial Intelligence advocates, is where to set the limits of autonomy when a device - which has no emotional capacity - has no concept of ethics.
Reply